IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpxmxx/v24y2022i10p1499-1520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ambiguity, appraisal, and affect: examining the connections between goal perceptions, emotional labour, and exhaustion

Author

Listed:
  • Randall S. Davis
  • Edmund C. Stazyk

Abstract

Although public management scholars have examined the causes and consequences of goal ambiguity in public organizations, we know less about how goal perceptions intersect with emotional labour (EL) to shape attitudes in the public workplace. To address this gap, we draw from appraisal theory to examine the connection between goal perceptions and EL in U.S. government agencies. We then explore how these two concepts work in concert to shape one aspect of burnout, emotional exhaustion. Our evidence suggests that goal perceptions and EL interact such that goal characteristics appear more threatening under heavy emotional work demands.

Suggested Citation

  • Randall S. Davis & Edmund C. Stazyk, 2022. "Ambiguity, appraisal, and affect: examining the connections between goal perceptions, emotional labour, and exhaustion," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(10), pages 1499-1520, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:24:y:2022:i:10:p:1499-1520
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2021.1909348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2021.1909348
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2021.1909348?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:24:y:2022:i:10:p:1499-1520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpxm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.