IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpxmxx/v19y2017i6p845-861.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complexity thinking in public administration’s theories-in-use

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth Eppel

Abstract

A compressed overview of complexity theory in public administration creates a starting point for comparison with other theories-in-use. The underpinning methodological traditions of extant theories of public administration are compared for compatibilities with complexity theory. Concepts generally acknowledged as within the scope and interest of public administration scholars (actors, policy processes, decisions, power, information and values) are used to extend the analysis of complexity theory’s contribution. The paper concludes that understanding the complexity friendliness of extant theories will both facilitate the greater use of complexity theory in PA and extend the explanatory capacity of the existing compatible theories.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth Eppel, 2017. "Complexity thinking in public administration’s theories-in-use," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(6), pages 845-861, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:19:y:2017:i:6:p:845-861
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1235721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2016.1235721
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2016.1235721?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sara Bonini Baraldi & Paolo Ferri, 2019. "From communism to market: business models and governance in heritage conservation in Poland," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(3), pages 787-812, September.
    2. Yi Yang, 2021. "Critical realism and complexity theory: Building a nonconstructivist systems research framework for effective governance analysis," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 177-183, January.
    3. Jeroen van der Heijden, 2022. "The Value of Systems Thinking for and in Regulatory Governance: An Evidence Synthesis," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    4. Nowell Chidakwa & Prosper Lunga, 2021. "Theoretical reflections of complexity theory concepts and principles in understanding multiple vulnerabilities: an in-depth analysis," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(4), pages 79-84, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:19:y:2017:i:6:p:845-861. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpxm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.