IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v13y2021i2p119-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An interpretative phenomenological analysis of parents’ experience of making sense of at risk mental state

Author

Listed:
  • Georgia Parratt
  • Chris Sanderson
  • Anjula Gupta
  • Gail Bradbury

Abstract

At Risk Mental State (ARMS) refers to people deemed at elevated risk of experiencing a first episode of psychosis. Family relationships often play a significant role in both the development and experience of early psychosis. How families make sense of problems influences their emotional experiences and relationships. To date there has been no research exploring how parents make sense of ARMS. Seven parents with a child meeting the ARMS criteria shared their experiences through semi-structured interviews and the data gathered were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. The findings suggested that parents experienced three stages when making sense of the ARMS criteria: initial uncertainty, experience of getting support and the process of looking to the future. Parents felt they lacked the skills to help their child and often had difficulty accessing the right services. The research also demonstrated that carer beliefs about psychosis identified in carers of those who experienced a first-episode psychosis are present even prior to a diagnosis of psychosis. Future work could consider ways of including and supporting parents during this sense-making process as well as better promoting ARMS services.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgia Parratt & Chris Sanderson & Anjula Gupta & Gail Bradbury, 2021. "An interpretative phenomenological analysis of parents’ experience of making sense of at risk mental state," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 119-129, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:119-129
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2020.1830154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2020.1830154
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2020.1830154?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:119-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.