IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v12y2020i1p79-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychotherapists’ experiences of withdrawn psychotic patients

Author

Listed:
  • Nardus Saayman

Abstract

Psychotic patients frequently struggle to relate to the external world and to others, including their psychotherapist. This does not imply that there is no attempt at relating, but rather that the attempt does not seem to acknowledge the full existence of the psychotherapist as other. If the patient’s attempt at relating is missed, they are at risk of being abandoned to the dread of their separation and loneliness. Psychotherapists see the process of establishing some form of relationship with their patient as a key component of a viable therapeutic endeavour. The point at which the withdrawn psychotic patient and the psychotherapist meet potentially marks the beginnings of relatedness disturbed by conflicting needs and wishes, the experience of which can potentially deter psychotherapists from further engagement. In this paper, psychodynamic psychotherapists’ accounts of engaging therapeutically with withdrawn psychotic patients are used to highlight therapists’ experiences and reactions to the specific phenomenon of withdrawal encountered in some psychotic patients. This dynamic is explored via the interaction between the therapist’s multidetermined need for relatedness and the patient’s psychotic withdrawal, and is discussed via three themes; The therapist’s need for relatedness, The therapist’s ego strength, and Reviving relatedness.

Suggested Citation

  • Nardus Saayman, 2020. "Psychotherapists’ experiences of withdrawn psychotic patients," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 79-88, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:79-88
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2019.1673804
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2019.1673804
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2019.1673804?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:79-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.