IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpstxx/v78y2024i1p79-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cameroon’s slow fertility transition: A gender perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Jean Christophe Fotso
  • John G. Cleland
  • Elihou O. Adje

Abstract

We interrogate the proposition that men’s attitudes have constrained the fertility transition in Cameroon, where fertility remains high and contraceptive use low despite much socio-economic progress. We use five Demographic and Health Surveys to compare trends in desired family size among young women and men and analyse matched monogamous couple data from the two most recent surveys to examine wives’ and husbands’ desires to stop childbearing and their relative influence on current contraceptive use. In 2018, average desired family size was 5.6 and 5.1, for young men and women respectively, and this difference (half a child) has not changed since 1998. Among matched couples, the proportions wanting to stop childbearing were similar in wives and their husbands, but wives perceived husbands to be much more pronatalist than themselves. Surprisingly, men’s own reported preferences were more closely associated with contraceptive use than wives’ perceptions of husbands’ preferences. We discerned little evidence that men’s attitudes have impeded reproductive change.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean Christophe Fotso & John G. Cleland & Elihou O. Adje, 2024. "Cameroon’s slow fertility transition: A gender perspective," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 78(1), pages 79-91, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpstxx:v:78:y:2024:i:1:p:79-91
    DOI: 10.1080/00324728.2023.2297687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00324728.2023.2297687
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00324728.2023.2297687?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpstxx:v:78:y:2024:i:1:p:79-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpst20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.