IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpstxx/v78y2024i1p63-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who eats last? Intra-household gender inequality in food allocation among children in educationally backward areas of India

Author

Listed:
  • Dipanwita Ghatak
  • Soham Sahoo
  • Sudipa Sarkar
  • Varun Sharma

Abstract

The practice of women eating after men is a common gender-inequitable food allocation mechanism among adults in Indian households and has been associated with poor health and nutritional outcomes for women. However, empirical evidence on whether a similar practice of girls eating after boys is prevalent among children is scarce. Using primary data from a household survey conducted in educationally backward areas of four Indian states, we provide new evidence of this practice among children. Almost 28 per cent of the sample households follow the mealtime custom of girls eating after boys. Scheduled Tribes and households with higher incomes are less likely to follow this practice. Other relevant factors include children’s relative ages by sex and an interplay between family size and children’s sex composition. While our findings may not be generalizable, they suggest an intersectionality between gender and other dimensions of inequality, namely social identity and economic class.

Suggested Citation

  • Dipanwita Ghatak & Soham Sahoo & Sudipa Sarkar & Varun Sharma, 2024. "Who eats last? Intra-household gender inequality in food allocation among children in educationally backward areas of India," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 78(1), pages 63-77, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpstxx:v:78:y:2024:i:1:p:63-77
    DOI: 10.1080/00324728.2023.2272991
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00324728.2023.2272991
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00324728.2023.2272991?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpstxx:v:78:y:2024:i:1:p:63-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpst20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.