IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpstxx/v76y2022i3p407-426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contraceptive choice as risk reduction? The relevance of local violence for women’s uptake of sterilization in Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Signe Svallfors

Abstract

Altered childbearing behaviour has been observed in many settings of violent conflict, but few studies have addressed fertility control. This is the first study to investigate empirically the relationship between local conflict and uptake of sterilization, the only contraceptive method that reflects a definitive stop to childbearing. The study is based on Colombia, a middle-income, low-fertility, and long-term conflict setting. It builds on a mixed methods approach, combining survey and conflict data with expert interviews. Fixed effects regressions show that local conflict is generally associated with an increased sterilization uptake. The interviews suggest that women may opt for sterilization when reversible methods become less accessible because of ongoing violence. Since sterilization is a relatively available contraceptive option in Colombia, it may represent a risk-aversion strategy for women who have completed their fertility goals. These findings can enlighten research and programmes on fertility and family planning in humanitarian contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Signe Svallfors, 2022. "Contraceptive choice as risk reduction? The relevance of local violence for women’s uptake of sterilization in Colombia," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(3), pages 407-426, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpstxx:v:76:y:2022:i:3:p:407-426
    DOI: 10.1080/00324728.2021.1953118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00324728.2021.1953118
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00324728.2021.1953118?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpstxx:v:76:y:2022:i:3:p:407-426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpst20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.