IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpstxx/v76y2022i3p363-385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The interplay of race/ethnicity and education in fertility patterns

Author

Listed:
  • Emma Zang
  • Chloe Sariego
  • Anirudh Krishnan

Abstract

This study examines the interplay between race/ethnicity and educational attainment in shaping completed fertility in the United States for women born 1961–80. Using data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 2006–17, we apply multilevel, multiprocess hazard models to account for unobserved heterogeneity and to estimate (1) cohort total fertility rates, (2) parity progression ratios, and (3) parity-specific fertility timing, for non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic women by educational attainment. We find that compared with their white counterparts, fertility was higher among Black and Hispanic women with less than high school education. However, among college-educated women, fertility levels were lowest among Black women and highest among Hispanic women. The difference in fertility between college-educated Black and white women is driven mainly by the smaller proportion of Black mothers having second births. We find little evidence that the observed racial/ethnic disparities in fertility levels by educational attainment are driven by differences in fertility timing.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma Zang & Chloe Sariego & Anirudh Krishnan, 2022. "The interplay of race/ethnicity and education in fertility patterns," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(3), pages 363-385, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpstxx:v:76:y:2022:i:3:p:363-385
    DOI: 10.1080/00324728.2022.2130965
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00324728.2022.2130965
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00324728.2022.2130965?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpstxx:v:76:y:2022:i:3:p:363-385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpst20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.