IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpstxx/v74y2020i1p119-138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can we study the family environment through census data? A comparison of households, dwellings, and domestic units in rural Mali

Author

Listed:
  • Véronique Hertrich
  • Pascaline Feuillet
  • Olivia Samuel
  • Assa Doumbia Gakou
  • Aurélien Dasré

Abstract

Are ‘statistical households’, as defined in national censuses, able to describe the family environment in Africa? Do they correspond to the family units that individuals identify with? To address this issue, we build on a follow-up survey in south-east Mali, which links national censuses with local censuses at the individual level (N ≈ 28,000 census observations). Three cross-sectional snapshots of family arrangements are compared: households recorded in national censuses, and family economic units and residential units recorded by local censuses. The national census household data appear poorly suited to documenting family living arrangements. They do not account for family economic units or residential units, but are highly conditioned by a normative representation centred on the nuclear family. Therefore, they fail to describe the complexity and diversity of people’s living spaces, making particular types of living arrangements invisible and increasing the likelihood of omitting individuals who do not fit into a nuclear model.

Suggested Citation

  • Véronique Hertrich & Pascaline Feuillet & Olivia Samuel & Assa Doumbia Gakou & Aurélien Dasré, 2020. "Can we study the family environment through census data? A comparison of households, dwellings, and domestic units in rural Mali," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(1), pages 119-138, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpstxx:v:74:y:2020:i:1:p:119-138
    DOI: 10.1080/00324728.2019.1694166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00324728.2019.1694166
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00324728.2019.1694166?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpstxx:v:74:y:2020:i:1:p:119-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpst20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.