IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rppexx/v37y2022i2p341-368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Skelmersdale: design and implementation of a British new town, 1961–1985

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Szydlowski

Abstract

New towns were a cornerstone of the post-war British planning system, but despite being both praised and derided, are in reality little understood. Research has focused on a few iconic examples, such as Cumbernauld and Milton Keynes, neglecting other new towns. Recent proposals to establish new development corporations in the Oxford-Cambridge Arc mean that an examination of new town design and implementation is particularly timely. This article responds by assessing the design and implementation of Skelmersdale New Town, near Liverpool, a little-studied example designated in 1961 and built out by its development corporation until 1985. Skelmersdale’s design reflected the context of early 1960s modernism, embodying the priorities of its architect-planner, Hugh Wilson – full automobility, urban character and compactness – over the local context. The subsequent implementation of Wilson’s design demonstrated the development corporation’s dependence on central government: it succeeded in providing housing, industrial premises and road infrastructure, but struggled to achieve the planned-for urban character. Skelmersdale’s experience reveals that while comprehensive modernist planning was a powerful tool in creating housing and infrastructure, it was limited by its inability to fully predict future economic and political conditions, and by the shifting attention of central government.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Szydlowski, 2022. "Skelmersdale: design and implementation of a British new town, 1961–1985," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 341-368, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rppexx:v:37:y:2022:i:2:p:341-368
    DOI: 10.1080/02665433.2021.1989710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02665433.2021.1989710
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02665433.2021.1989710?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rppexx:v:37:y:2022:i:2:p:341-368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rppe20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.