IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v23y2023i3p155-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do line call errors differ between men’s and women’s events in tennis? A case study from the 2021 Wimbledon Tournament

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Carboch
  • Petra Praveckova
  • Otto Kolbinger

Abstract

Line umpires make quick decisions. Ball trajectories and mechanical characteristics (velocity, spin) are different for male and female events, which can affect the decision quality. The aim is to analyse patterns of line umpire errors at the Wimbledon 2021 with a particular focus on differences between men’s and women’s matches. Data were obtained from the official match reports from 290 matches where the Hawk-Eye system was used to determine the umpires’ calls and used to calculate descriptive statistics and to run different linear regression models. Line umpires made 1 error per 17.7 games, with a mean error size of 30 ± 39 mm. Error size on long lines (18 ± 24 mm) was smaller compared to cross lines (40 ± 45 mm), which also served as a significant predictor in all regression models. In women’s matches, we observed a 7 mm bigger mean error size, which was in particular caused by a significantly bigger average error size for erroneous “out” calls (12.2 mm), which could be supported by the regression models. These results help to understand human decision-making performance on the grass. To improve line umpiring, we suggest to put awareness about the nature of line umpire errors, which indeed indicates that the task differs between men’s and women’s matches.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Carboch & Petra Praveckova & Otto Kolbinger, 2023. "Do line call errors differ between men’s and women’s events in tennis? A case study from the 2021 Wimbledon Tournament," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 155-166, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:23:y:2023:i:3:p:155-166
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2023.2204683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2023.2204683
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2023.2204683?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:23:y:2023:i:3:p:155-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.