IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v16y2016i1p171-190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soccer as a Study Case for Analytic Trends in Collective Sports Training: A Survey

Author

Listed:
  • J. Enrique Arriaza
  • D. Marcos Zuniga

Abstract

Automated tools for assisting the behaviour analysis of collective sports are becoming a relevant factor to make the difference on improving the individual and collective performance.This work presents a survey on the methodologies and tools for collective sports analysis and training, with special focus in soccer. The objective of this survey is to provide to analysts and researchers with an updated overview of collective sports analysis and to provide practitioners with a mean which could assist them on determining the most adequate methodology and/or tool for their requirements and context.A comprehensive review is presented, from both the scientific methodologies and the commercial solutions, focused in the most prominent tools of the last decade. The study establishes the general structure of match analysis methodologies, categorised in terms of the type of technology, and establishing the advantages and limitations of the different groups.The study concludes about the future trends on automatic behaviour analysis in collective sports, from both the training methodologies and the expected focus which tools assisting in this context should emphasise.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Enrique Arriaza & D. Marcos Zuniga, 2016. "Soccer as a Study Case for Analytic Trends in Collective Sports Training: A Survey," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 171-190, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:16:y:2016:i:1:p:171-190
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2016.11868879
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2016.11868879
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2016.11868879?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:16:y:2016:i:1:p:171-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.