IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjpaxx/v77y2011i4p354-367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community and Household Perceptions in Urban Services Demand

Author

Listed:
  • James Spencer

Abstract

Problem: Planners tend to assume that household choices are made using rational decision making criteria based on accurate perceptions of a) quality, price, and reliability in urban services; and b) the risks associated with alternatives. Expectations, perceptions, and inaccurate and insufficient information may also matter, but their effects are difficult to measure and have been little studied. Growing cities in developing countries offer useful tests of accurate rationality, as newly provided infrastructure must often compete in markets where information is incomplete and risks can be considerable. Little scholarly research exists, however, on nonmaterial motivations (such as fears, perceptions, and expectations) for service demands. Purpose: This article addresses this gap by comparing residents’ perceptions of past illness and fears of environmental and health risks with respect to more material household decision making factors such as water quality and cost. Using an original sample survey, this article tests the independent relationships among reported illness, opinions on the water–illness relationship, and perceptions of pollution in residents’ investments in piped water. Methods: The results and analyses are based on an original household survey conducted in Can Tho, a rapidly growing city in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam. Basic comparative statistics about household perceptions of water quality, environmental pollution, and decision making with regard to water supply investments are followed by explanatory regression models to determine why households choose to invest in clean water supplies. Results and conclusions: Findings suggest that fears of future illness are more important than reports and perceptions of past illness, and that industrial pollution is a rapidly growing concern that prompts household-level water supply improvements. These results show that greater attention must be paid to how perceptions, expectations, and fears influence household support for and investment in new infrastructure. Takeaway for practice: In rapidly developing cities, or other settings subject to sudden change, resident fears and perceptions may drive decision making as much as the quality and price of the service provided. This is likely more true the more quickly circumstances change. Research support: This project was supported by the University of Hawai’i at Manoa's Globalization Research Center.

Suggested Citation

  • James Spencer, 2011. "Community and Household Perceptions in Urban Services Demand," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(4), pages 354-367.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjpaxx:v:77:y:2011:i:4:p:354-367
    DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2011.611099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01944363.2011.611099
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01944363.2011.611099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Denantes, Julia & Donoso, Guillermo, 2021. "Factors influencing customer satisfaction with water service quality in Chile," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjpaxx:v:77:y:2011:i:4:p:354-367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjpa20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.