IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjbsxx/v38y2023i1p95-118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Governance Theory for Cross-Border Regions: Identifying Principles and Processes with Grounded Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Jose L. Wong Villanueva
  • Tetsuo Kidokoro
  • Fumihiko Seta

Abstract

The rise of governance in border studies has become an opportunity to increase efficiency, generate better institutional arrangements and reduce the gap between theory and practice. However, the multiplicity of theories where cross-border governance can be placed, the lack of consensus on concepts and the multiple disciplines that can be used for studying it have increased the need of more comprehensive theoretical frameworks. From an evolutionary-constructivist approach, this paper explores the principles and processes behind cross-border governance evolution through a Grounded Theory methodology based on 49 interviews. The proposed theory identifies four principles – shared experience, Nation State construction, scale difference and notions of power–, defining governance as a mean and result of the territorialization of cross-border actors’ knowledge construction and power concentration at different levels, sectors and scales, based on five on-going processes – knowledge creation, articulation of relationships, decision-making, implementation & management and appraisal of results –.

Suggested Citation

  • Jose L. Wong Villanueva & Tetsuo Kidokoro & Fumihiko Seta, 2023. "A Governance Theory for Cross-Border Regions: Identifying Principles and Processes with Grounded Theory," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 95-118, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:38:y:2023:i:1:p:95-118
    DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2021.1878924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08865655.2021.1878924
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08865655.2021.1878924?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:38:y:2023:i:1:p:95-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjbs20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.