IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjbsxx/v37y2022i4p723-740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

#StayHomeSaveLives: Essentializing Entry and Canada’s Biopolitical COVID Borders

Author

Listed:
  • Rabindra Chaulagain
  • Wael M. Nasser
  • Julie E. E. Young

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic ushered in a systematic closure of national borders at a global scale, and a subsequent but selective reopening under the guise of “essential” entry and labor. We examine the Government of Canada’s Twitter messaging around border closures and exceptions, using narrative and textual analysis to interrogate how the government has constructed essential and non-essential entry and work in support of national needs including critical infrastructure that sustains the Canadian economy and population. The Canadian government deployed the essentialization process as a biopolitical mechanism to access the labor pool that already existed within Canada and that was readily available beyond the border. Rather than complete closure, the Canadian border had to be “elastic” allowing the entry and making use of the labor of international students, temporary foreign workers, and people with precarious status to sustain national life. We argue that studying the digital spaces of migration management will remain key in any post-pandemic world.

Suggested Citation

  • Rabindra Chaulagain & Wael M. Nasser & Julie E. E. Young, 2022. "#StayHomeSaveLives: Essentializing Entry and Canada’s Biopolitical COVID Borders," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 723-740, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:37:y:2022:i:4:p:723-740
    DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2021.1985588
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08865655.2021.1985588
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08865655.2021.1985588?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:37:y:2022:i:4:p:723-740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjbs20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.