IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjbsxx/v37y2022i1p209-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sinai’s Imaginary Boundary Line in Twenty-first Century

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Shams

Abstract

An imaginary line had been assigned on small-scale non-survey or non-treaty compiled maps to mark the Egyptian-Levantine boundary, a repetitive pattern since – at least – the sixteenth century CE. It ran through Sinai Peninsula between Suez and Rafah. Little is discussed about the origins of the line which dates back to the emergence of the cartographic states. The Ottomans first attempted to formalize this line in the Firman of 1841 CE. The latter became a favorable start point during the negotiations of the Turco-Egyptian boundary line between Egypt/British and Palestine/Ottoman in 1906 CE, and a point of historic review throughout the twentieth century CE. This commentary explores the origins of the line, whether it is a line “through the sand” or represents the notion of a “natural boundary,” or a cartographic thought driven from “tribal territories” or an “administrative boundary.” Paradoxically, the line was utilized to support the political position of the Egyptian government in twenty-first century CE.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Shams, 2022. "Sinai’s Imaginary Boundary Line in Twenty-first Century," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 209-218, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:37:y:2022:i:1:p:209-218
    DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2021.1968930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08865655.2021.1968930
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08865655.2021.1968930?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:37:y:2022:i:1:p:209-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjbs20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.