IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rherxx/v68y2017i1p2-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adam Smith and Jeremy Bentham in the Australian colonies

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Berg

Abstract

How did 19th century Australians think about liberalism, economics and political economy more generally? Nineteenth century Australia has been described variously as having a ‘neoclassical’, enlightenment, or Benthamite political culture. This paper provides an empirical approach to the question of early Australian ideas. Exploiting the records of 1891 book sales and auctions in Australia between 1800 and 1849, the paper examines the relative prevalence of key economic, political and liberal texts available to 19th century Australians. The works of classical enlightenment authors such as Adam Smith and John Locke were far more prevalent, and more likely in demand, than those of Jeremy Bentham. To the extent utilitarian ideas were prevalent, they were more in the form of William Paley’s conservatism than Bentham’s radicalism.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Berg, 2017. "Adam Smith and Jeremy Bentham in the Australian colonies," History of Economics Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(1), pages 2-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rherxx:v:68:y:2017:i:1:p:2-16
    DOI: 10.1080/10370196.2018.1449084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10370196.2018.1449084
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10370196.2018.1449084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rherxx:v:68:y:2017:i:1:p:2-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rher .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.