IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rherxx/v64y2016i1p2-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thomas Robert Malthus and the Utilitarians

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Hollander

Abstract

In his Utilitarianism and Malthus’s Virtue Ethics (2014) Sergio Cremaschi argues for a distinctive, theologically based, utilitarianism adopted by Thomas Robert Malthus contrasting with the utilitarianism of the Philosophical Radicals. This paper restates and reinforces the case for a coalescence of the Malthusian and secular utilitarian perspectives primarily on the following grounds. In an effort to reconcile theology and welfare, Malthus effectively undermined the former by radically reinterpreting the scriptures to justify a reduced birth rate. His transition in the 1820s to the Ricardian vision of industrial development turned on perceived changes in the empirical and legislative environment with no theological input whatsoever. Moreover, while Malthus at times perceived virtue divorced from consequences for happiness, so too did Ricardo and J.S. Mill, even when at odds with the wealth and happiness components of the utilitarian maximand.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel Hollander, 2016. "Thomas Robert Malthus and the Utilitarians," History of Economics Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(1), pages 2-26, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rherxx:v:64:y:2016:i:1:p:2-26
    DOI: 10.1080/10370196.2016.1224025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10370196.2016.1224025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10370196.2016.1224025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rherxx:v:64:y:2016:i:1:p:2-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rher .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.