IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgovxx/v8y2023i2p256-282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The government-business relations: how Chinese business leaders take part in government policy formulation in the National People’s Congress

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyu Yang
  • Abraham Y. Nahm

Abstract

To better understand the government-business relations and the governance in China, this study investigates the effects of Chinese business leaders’ membership in the National People’s Congress (NPC) on government subsidy, firm’s strategic change, and labor inefficiency. Our sample consists of 959 firms with business leaders in the 10th and 11th NPC, which account for 88% of the total firms that have business leaders in the NPC. To make a valid comparison, we used various criteria to create a matching sample of 44,894 firms that have no business leaders in the NPC. The results suggest that NPC membership has a positive effect on government subsidy, and negative effects on firm’s strategic change and labor inefficiency. After conducting a post-hoc analysis, we found interesting interaction effects of NPC membership and firm ownership upon firm’s strategic change and labor inefficiency. State-owned firms had stronger negative relationships between NPC membership and strategic change, and between NPC membership and labor inefficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyu Yang & Abraham Y. Nahm, 2023. "The government-business relations: how Chinese business leaders take part in government policy formulation in the National People’s Congress," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 256-282, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:8:y:2023:i:2:p:256-282
    DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2022.2147716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23812346.2022.2147716
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23812346.2022.2147716?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:8:y:2023:i:2:p:256-282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.