IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgovxx/v6y2021i1p131-154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attitudes toward welfare spending in urban China: evidence from a survey in two provinces and social policy implications

Author

Listed:
  • Alex Jingwei He
  • Jiwei Qian
  • Kerry Ratigan

Abstract

What explains divergent levels of support for welfare spending in a non-Western authoritarian state? Can self-interest and ideology, two major theoretical frameworks from cross-national research, explain attitudinal patterns in China? Using data collected from an original survey in two provinces in 2017, we examined urban Chinese attitudes toward welfare spending. We focused on three social policy domains with distinctive characteristics: education, healthcare, and poverty alleviation. All domains received fairly high levels of support for increased spending from our sample. Our regression models suggest that self-interest and ideology are both associated with welfare attitudes in urban China, but self-interest variables operate in unexpected ways, reflecting the distinctive socio-economic and cultural context in which welfare attitudes are formed. This study concludes with broad policy implications for social policy reform in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Alex Jingwei He & Jiwei Qian & Kerry Ratigan, 2021. "Attitudes toward welfare spending in urban China: evidence from a survey in two provinces and social policy implications," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 131-154, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:6:y:2021:i:1:p:131-154
    DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2019.1709324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23812346.2019.1709324
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23812346.2019.1709324?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:6:y:2021:i:1:p:131-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.