IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgovxx/v5y2020i1p90-109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coproduction of community public service: evidence from china’s community foundations

Author

Listed:
  • Shihong Weng
  • Yunxiang Zhang

Abstract

With the resurgence of interest in community foundation (CF), questions arise around how do CFs produce and deliver community public services. Although the CF has a long history, the rapid development of CFs around world became the significant institutional change in local public affairs, the functions of CFs have received little attention in the literature. The existing literature about CFs usually be dichotomy: model or movement. This article presents a new theoretical framework, according to whether there are individual or collective coproduction and they participate top-down or bottom-up, to explain the function of China’s CFs. Coproduction advocates intensive engagement and collaboration of citizens in community public service delivery. And coproduction seems to play an important role in both instrumental and symbolic terms in the production and delivery of public goods or services by joining-up government, for-profit and non-profit organizations. The findings show how the CFs provide public services in China through the lens of coproduction that involves sharing information, resources, activities, risks and decision-making in a bid to achieve an agreed public outcome. In the new governance, many governments are moving away from agency-centric bureaucracy and towards citizen-centric mission to delivering public services.

Suggested Citation

  • Shihong Weng & Yunxiang Zhang, 2020. "Coproduction of community public service: evidence from china’s community foundations," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 90-109, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:5:y:2020:i:1:p:90-109
    DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2019.1710048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23812346.2019.1710048
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23812346.2019.1710048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:5:y:2020:i:1:p:90-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.