IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgovxx/v5y2020i1p68-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Citizen engagement and co-production of e-government services in China

Author

Listed:
  • Liang Ma
  • Xia Wu

Abstract

With the increasing complexities of public administration and the challenges of financial cutback, government has been increasingly coproducing public services with citizens and other stakeholders. In this study, we use the case of ‘I find mistakes for government websites’ initiated by the central government in China in 2015 to explore what drives online co-production. Citizens are mobilized to identify and report ‘bugs’ of government websites, which vary substantially across regions and administrative levels. We find that citizens pay more attention to government websites at higher administrative levels, which receive more citizen reports. Further analyses reveal that co-production is driven by different groups of variables at different government levels, which may be attributable to varying functions and user groups. For government websites at city level, co-production is negatively related to e-government performance and economic affluence but positively related to population size and Internet access. For provincial government websites, only population size matters. These findings help to better understand the underpinning mechanisms of online co-production, and generate helpful implications for e-government practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang Ma & Xia Wu, 2020. "Citizen engagement and co-production of e-government services in China," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 68-89, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:5:y:2020:i:1:p:68-89
    DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2019.1705052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23812346.2019.1705052
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23812346.2019.1705052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:5:y:2020:i:1:p:68-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.