IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgovxx/v3y2018i4p461-476.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Epistemological globalization and the shaping of social policy in China

Author

Listed:
  • Tao Liu

Abstract

Most studies on social policy research in China have followed the logic of methodological and theoretical nationalism. However, increased communication across borders and the trend of internationalization in the domain of social policy have challenged uniquely nationalistic narratives. The emergence of studies on global social policy has contributed to constructing an international arena of social policy within which the interplay of various international and supranational actors has exerted considerable influence on agenda setting and the conceptual frameworks of national social policy. However, such a theoretical approach has been neglected in both Chinese and international academia. This essay connects to the research on global social policy and elaborates an independent communication field transcending the scope of state-centered social policy. Through analyzing three social policy fields—old age pension schemes, work accident insurance and social assistance scheme since the reform and open-door policy—the author constructs an interaction and communication arena strongly shaped by international semantics and narratives. Epistemological globalization assumes that national knowledge reserves and structures are increasingly shaped by the flow of ideas across nation-state borders.

Suggested Citation

  • Tao Liu, 2018. "Epistemological globalization and the shaping of social policy in China," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(4), pages 461-476, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:3:y:2018:i:4:p:461-476
    DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2018.1519307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23812346.2018.1519307
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23812346.2018.1519307?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:3:y:2018:i:4:p:461-476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.