IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgovxx/v3y2018i3p268-291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Party-state, nation, empire: rethinking the grammar of Chinese Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Vivienne Shue

Abstract

Western political scientists, regarding China as a nation-state like any other, commonly classify it as a ‘party-state’ and as ‘authoritarian’. Yet China’s transition to modern statehood differed from that of almost every other postimperial or ‘new’ nation on the planet. Drawing on new scholarship in the history of empire and of modern China, this essay reflects on certain repercussions of the Sinic world’s singular experience of empire, imperial breakdown, and passage to political modernity. What light, we ask, can reexamining China’s oddly intact transfiguration—from dynastic empire to people’s republic—shed on how the Party has governed since 1949? With a view to tailoring an altered research agenda for political scientists today—one better fitted to grasping what Chinese authorities may mean when they refer to building ‘socialism with Chinese characteristics for a new era’—we consider, in particular, several techniques of governance associated with empire relating to scale and strategy, to hierarchy and differentiation.

Suggested Citation

  • Vivienne Shue, 2018. "Party-state, nation, empire: rethinking the grammar of Chinese Governance," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 268-291, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:3:y:2018:i:3:p:268-291
    DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2018.1488495
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23812346.2018.1488495
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23812346.2018.1488495?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:3:y:2018:i:3:p:268-291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.