IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgovxx/v3y2018i2p129-157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governance models and policy framework: some Chinese perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Ehtisham Ahmad

Abstract

While the Chinese governance system retains the characteristic of being in the class of ‘administrative progression models’, it has evolved greatly since the Responsibility System was introduced in the late 1970s, and spread from agriculture to SOEs and local governments. As fiscal strains developed, modern institutions and tax and budget systems were introduced from 1993/4 on, and have been evolving since then. While there has been rapid economic growth, stresses have emerged in terms of congestion and pollution in the major metropolitan areas, increasing spatial and interpersonal inequality, as well as risks associated with possible rent-seeking and buildup of liabilities. Additional economic, institutional and legal reforms are needed to strengthen the governance framework, yet policies taken from US-style competition models may not work. Further, dire predictions based on a medieval characterization of the Chinese model are misleading, and fail to take into account the role of institutions and information that have transformed the Chinese governance structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Ehtisham Ahmad, 2018. "Governance models and policy framework: some Chinese perspectives," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 129-157, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:3:y:2018:i:2:p:129-157
    DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2018.1455414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23812346.2018.1455414
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23812346.2018.1455414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:3:y:2018:i:2:p:129-157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.