IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgovxx/v3y2018i1p25-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Top-level design, reform pressures, and local adaptations: an interpretation of the trajectory of reform since the 18th CPC Party Congress

Author

Listed:
  • Xuedong Yang
  • Jian Yan

Abstract

Since the 18th Party Congress of the CPC, the Chinese leadership has emphasized ‘top-level design’ in their strategic thinking on reform. In practice, they have attempted to dialectically combine ‘top-level design’ with the approach of ‘crossing the river by feeling the stones’. Such efforts have led to the emergence of a range of decision-making, implementation and supervision institutions primarily aimed at implementing ‘top-level design’. With top-level decision makers demonstrating both ambition and a sense of urgency, the shift in reform strategies has also placed new pressures on local Party and government organizations, which have been forced to accordingly adjust their thinking and behavior. There are some tensions between the current top-down manner of institutionalization and the tradition of lower-level autonomy which began after the initiation of reform and opening up. How to translate such tensions into momentum for reform is an issue meriting further observation and analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuedong Yang & Jian Yan, 2018. "Top-level design, reform pressures, and local adaptations: an interpretation of the trajectory of reform since the 18th CPC Party Congress," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 25-48, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:3:y:2018:i:1:p:25-48
    DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2018.1428075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23812346.2018.1428075
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23812346.2018.1428075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:3:y:2018:i:1:p:25-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.