IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgovxx/v3y2018i1p101-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An assessment of China’s ability to regulate its iron and steel industries

Author

Listed:
  • Thais Moretz

Abstract

Taking the iron and steel industries as a case study, this paper examines China’s ability to implement policies and regulate its industry. The paper first explains that modern government regulation theories go beyond the relationship between government and markets, adding to them the role of civil societies, human behavior and other fields. The paper then sheds light on the specific characteristics of China’s regulatory system and identifies a few elements that make it unique, such as the complexity of central and local government relationships and the large role that State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) retain in China. Lastly, the paper identifies the Chinese policies for the iron and steel industries and then analyzes how SOEs, local government, civil societies, and small corporations behaved during the implementation process of these policies. While the previous literature mainly focuses on the role of Chinese experts in policy formulation, this study extends the previous analysis with the implementation process. Using the iron and steel industries as a case study, this paper examines the institutional responses to China’s central government regulations, assessing China’s ability to regulate the two industries serving as the basis for the case studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Thais Moretz, 2018. "An assessment of China’s ability to regulate its iron and steel industries," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 101-121, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:3:y:2018:i:1:p:101-121
    DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2018.1428061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23812346.2018.1428061
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23812346.2018.1428061?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:3:y:2018:i:1:p:101-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.