IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgovxx/v3y2018i1p1-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structure hypothesis of authoritarian rule: evidence from the lifespans of China’s dynasties

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenghan Cao
  • Xiaoming Zhang

Abstract

Scholars on authoritarianism in China have found that authoritarian resilience is partly derived from the ruling structure contained in the authoritarianism which is also known as the structure of ‘officials governed by the central government, people governed by local governments’ or the ‘ruling structure of the system of prefectures and counties’. Under such ruling structure, the central government, by implementing centralized governance of its officials and decentralized governance of its people, is able to control social and agency risks. Hence, this structure helps the central government to maintain its authoritarian rule and the stability of the state in the long run. This paper summarizes the above point of view into the ‘structure hypothesis of authoritarian rule’: for a large-scale authoritarian state with a vast territory and a large population, if it establishes the system of prefectures and counties as its ruling structure, it will enjoy a high degree of stability; on the contrary, if it deviates from the system of prefectures and counties, the country may be less stable. This paper provides new evidence for this hypothesis based on the lifespans of China’s major dynasties.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenghan Cao & Xiaoming Zhang, 2018. "Structure hypothesis of authoritarian rule: evidence from the lifespans of China’s dynasties," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1-24, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:3:y:2018:i:1:p:1-24
    DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2017.1379167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23812346.2017.1379167
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23812346.2017.1379167?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:3:y:2018:i:1:p:1-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.