IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgovxx/v2y2017i2p194-208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legitimacy acquisition of social enterprise in China: a case study of Canyou initiatives

Author

Listed:
  • Li Jian

Abstract

In the special institutional conditions of China, social enterprise faced unfavorable normative and regulatory environments for creating social and economic value under resource-strapped; the growth of social enterprises was essentially equal of the acquisition of legitimacy. More and more social enterprises adopted a hybrid structure including businesses, foundation and NGOs to acquire legitimacy. In this article, employing an in-depth case study, we presented our observations and conceptualization adopted by Canyou initiatives—an 18 years old establish social enterprise to acquire and nurture legitimacy through its Conglomeration in China. The findings highlight how Conglomeration helped the social enterprise to acquire legitimacy throughout three major aspects: the regulative legitimacy, the moral legitimacy and cognitive legitimacy. As an innovation of social enterprises under the external legal constraints, Conglomeration also increases the internal coordination and management performance of the organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Jian, 2017. "Legitimacy acquisition of social enterprise in China: a case study of Canyou initiatives," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 194-208, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:2:y:2017:i:2:p:194-208
    DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2017.1311497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23812346.2017.1311497
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23812346.2017.1311497?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:2:y:2017:i:2:p:194-208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.