IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgovxx/v2y2017i2p169-193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improvement in the law on farmland transfer in China from a contract governance perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Linlin Li

Abstract

This article focuses on the improvement in the current law on farmland transfer in China from a contract governance perspective. The current regulation on farmland transfer in China features strong government control and suppressed private land rights. Whether in terms of the law or in practice, the participation of individual farmers in the transfer of their contracted farmland is not secured. In this research, the author argues that the design of new procedural rules contributes to better protection of individual farmer’s participation in farmland transfer. Moreover, the research on contract governance provides a great inspiration for the design of such procedural rules. In essence, this contract governance approach is a mix of top-down government regulation and bottom-up autonomy of private parties to the farmland transfer contract. It is hoped that a proper balance between private autonomy and the public regulation of farmland use can be struck under this new governance perspective. To some extent, a shift from the current regulatory system to a governance perspective in regulating farmland transfer helps to implement the existing rules and related policies in practice, on the one hand; on the other hand, it helps to formulate new rules governing certain behaviors of the parties involved.

Suggested Citation

  • Linlin Li, 2017. "Improvement in the law on farmland transfer in China from a contract governance perspective," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 169-193, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:2:y:2017:i:2:p:169-193
    DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2017.1286770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23812346.2017.1286770
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23812346.2017.1286770?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:2:y:2017:i:2:p:169-193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.