IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgovxx/v1y2016i4p564-573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why local governments need performance evaluation: intermediary institutions in the performance-based budgeting process in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zaozao Zhao

Abstract

Performance-based budgeting (PBB) focuses on how to use performance indicators and measurement information during the budgetary process so that the public sector and governments can manage public resources more efficiently and effectively. Since the 1980s, PBB has been popular in public budgeting reform around the world. However, there is no universally accepted definition and practical model of PBB. In China, for over 10 years now, there has appeared a role for special Performance Evaluation Intermediary Institutions (PEIIs) in the PPB and these have become an important participant in the budgetary process. This research will firstly introduce the characteristics and development of PEIIs in China. Secondly, it will try to reveal why local governments increasingly depend on PEII in the PBB process. There are three main reasons: the first is to make up for governments’ limited technical capacity in performance evaluation; the second is to increase the credibility of performance evaluation among stakeholders; and the third is to move debate about resource allocation from within government to wider external forums. Finally, this research presents and discusses three findings: firstly, the better capability the PEIIs have, the bigger impact the PEIIs can have; secondly, that trust between the PEII and the local financial department is a very important success factor; and thirdly, the characteristics of local governments and financial departments affect the role and impact of PEIIs.

Suggested Citation

  • Zaozao Zhao, 2016. "Why local governments need performance evaluation: intermediary institutions in the performance-based budgeting process in China," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(4), pages 564-573, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:1:y:2016:i:4:p:564-573
    DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2016.1245472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23812346.2016.1245472
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23812346.2016.1245472?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:1:y:2016:i:4:p:564-573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.