IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgfmxx/v12y2021i1p77-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Culture and art policy analysis in fashion capitals: New York, London, Seoul, Beijing, and Jakarta

Author

Listed:
  • Dayun Jeong
  • Eunha Chun
  • Eunju Ko

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the status and policy of the fashion industry of fashion capitals worldwide, and to suggest a policy direction for each city to develop its fashion industry. To this end, we examined the status of the fashion industries which were selected as representative fashion capitals, based on the apparel industry development stage and global cities index, and analyzed their fashion policies to compare. The cities were classified into four stages: Jakarta, classified as the 1st stage, is an architect state, and Beijing, classified as the 2nd stage, is an engineer state. Seoul, the 3rd stage, is an architect state. The final stage, stage 4th, was divided into two states. London is a Patron state and New York is a facilitator state. This international comparative study is of great significance in that it has improved the understanding of the fashion policies and analyzed the institutional meaning and policy performance of these cities and provided information that could be used to promote their rationality and effectiveness. Therefore, it is expected that fashion capitals will be able to solve the actions to be taken to advance to the next stage through the analysis in this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Dayun Jeong & Eunha Chun & Eunju Ko, 2021. "Culture and art policy analysis in fashion capitals: New York, London, Seoul, Beijing, and Jakarta," Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 77-94, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgfmxx:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:77-94
    DOI: 10.1080/20932685.2020.1804433
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20932685.2020.1804433
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20932685.2020.1804433?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgfmxx:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:77-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgfm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.