IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/revpoe/v36y2024i1p178-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Activity Levels and the Flexibility of the Degree of Capacity Utilisation in the US

Author

Listed:
  • Matteo Deleidi
  • Santiago José Gahn
  • Riccardo Pariboni

Abstract

In recent years, a revival of the so-called ‘utilisation controversy’ has seen several scholars engage in a lively debate that still revolves around the same old question: what should we expect, beyond the short run, with regard to the degree of capacity utilisation? In this article, we tackle this issue by investigating the relationship between the level of economic activity and the ensuing utilisation of existing capacity. In order to assess the effect of the former on the latter and to provide a robust and clear picture of this phenomenon, we use a Structural VAR and Local Projection methodologies to estimate three alternative models, based on monthly data on the US economy. After presenting our empirical results, which point to only temporary effects on capacity utilisation of shocks to the level of economic activity, we verify their compatibility with alternative demand-led growth models. We conclude that autonomous demand-led models cum convergence towards normal utilisation perform better in terms of consistency with the econometric evidence, while the latter seems to call for a re-examination of ‘conventional’ versions of the Neo-Kaleckian model.

Suggested Citation

  • Matteo Deleidi & Santiago José Gahn & Riccardo Pariboni, 2024. "Activity Levels and the Flexibility of the Degree of Capacity Utilisation in the US," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 178-201, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:36:y:2024:i:1:p:178-201
    DOI: 10.1080/09538259.2021.2018254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09538259.2021.2018254
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09538259.2021.2018254?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:36:y:2024:i:1:p:178-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.