IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/revpoe/v35y2023i2p476-493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Economic Principle of Political Liberalism: A Comparison of Rawls and Sugden

Author

Listed:
  • Federica Nalli
  • Paolo Santori

Abstract

In his 2018 book, The Community of Advantage, economist Robert Sugden sets out his Principle of Mutual Benefit. This paper investigates the role that Sugden’s principle occupies in Rawls’ Political Liberalism. Would it be chosen by contracting parties in the Original Position and with what implications? We firstly show the potential complementarities of Rawls’ and Sugden’s approaches, integrating them in a broad philosophical framework. Second, we describe three scenarios in which Sugden’s principle could be integrated into Rawls’s system– (1) as a second order principle of the Difference Principle, (2) as a replacement of the whole Second Principle, or (3) as a substitute for the Difference Principle. We test each hypothesis through Rawls’s artificial device of the Original Position. We suggest that the Principle of Mutual Benefit can be understood as a substitute for the Difference Principle, reaffirming the importance of social justice in guaranteeing the stability of a market society.

Suggested Citation

  • Federica Nalli & Paolo Santori, 2023. "The Economic Principle of Political Liberalism: A Comparison of Rawls and Sugden," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 476-493, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:35:y:2023:i:2:p:476-493
    DOI: 10.1080/09538259.2021.1951476
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09538259.2021.1951476
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09538259.2021.1951476?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:35:y:2023:i:2:p:476-493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.