IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/revpoe/v34y2022i3p420-445.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monetary Policy Responses to Covid-19: A Comparison with the 2008 Crisis and Implications for the Future of Central Banking

Author

Listed:
  • Matheus R. Grasselli

Abstract

The policy responses of major central banks to the Covid-19 financial and economic crisis were faster, larger, and broader in scope than those in response to the 2008 global financial crisis. This article explains in detail the conventional and unconventional measures adopted by the U.S. Federal Reserve and reviews similar measures adopted by the Bank of England, the Bank of Canada, the European Central Bank and the Bank of Japan. Apart from lowering interest rates and acting as lenders of last resort to financial institutions, these central banks embraced large scale asset purchases as a core crisis fighting tool, with the corresponding expansion in balance sheet that they entail. The article connects this change in emphasis in central bank intervention to the normalization of shadow banking, or market-based financial intermediation, that happened between the two crises. Other extensions of the role of central banks made possible by the scope of the policy responses to Covid-19, including direct support to sectors beyond the financial industry, are also explored.

Suggested Citation

  • Matheus R. Grasselli, 2022. "Monetary Policy Responses to Covid-19: A Comparison with the 2008 Crisis and Implications for the Future of Central Banking," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 420-445, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:34:y:2022:i:3:p:420-445
    DOI: 10.1080/09538259.2021.1908778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09538259.2021.1908778
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09538259.2021.1908778?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:34:y:2022:i:3:p:420-445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.