IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/revape/v38y2011i127p61-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is ‘another world’ really possible? Re-examining counter-hegemonic forces in post-apartheid South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Luke Sinwell

Abstract

A wide body of scholarly literature on social movements on an international level emphatically, but uncritically, declares that ‘another world is possible’. This paper investigates this trend and its implications for political and academic practice in post-apartheid South Africa, where community-based movements have emerged primarily in order to access basic services. In particular, it highlights the pivotal role that the state and poor people's immediate basic needs play in limiting social movements' contribution towards a transformative development agenda. Paying close attention to poor people's struggles and needs, the paper argues that there is a sharp disjuncture between the ideologies manufactured by academics, and the worldviews that the working class and poor possess. It concludes by providing insight into the possibilities for post-apartheid political struggles -- praxis -- to lead to the formation of class consciousness and to a formidable challenge to neoliberalism.

Suggested Citation

  • Luke Sinwell, 2011. "Is ‘another world’ really possible? Re-examining counter-hegemonic forces in post-apartheid South Africa," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(127), pages 61-76, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:revape:v:38:y:2011:i:127:p:61-76
    DOI: 10.1080/03056244.2011.552588
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03056244.2011.552588
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03056244.2011.552588?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luke Sinwell, 2012. "Sharpening the Weapons of the weak : a response to Carin Runciman," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(134), pages 665-671, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revape:v:38:y:2011:i:127:p:61-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CREA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.