IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/reroxx/v34y2021i1p3355-3381.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic reference point method with probabilistic linguistic information based on the regret theory for public health emergency decision-making

Author

Listed:
  • Wenting Xue
  • Zeshui Xu
  • Xiaomei Mi
  • Zhiliang Ren

Abstract

Group emergency decision-making is an uncertain and dynamic process, in which the decision makers may be bounded rational and have a risk appetite. To depict the vague qualitative assessments, the probabilistic linguistic term sets are employed to express the perceptions of decision makers. First, considering the regret-aversion of the decision makers’ psychological characteristic, the value function and the regret-rejoice function in the regret theory are modified to adapt the probabilistic linguistic information. Second, the definition and aggregation operators of the probabilistic linguistic time variable are proposed to describe and aggregate the dynamic decision information. Third, the probabilistic linguistic models based on the dynamic reference point method and the regret theory are studied to maximise the expectation-levels of alternatives at the relative time point. The proposed method is applied to select the optimal response strategy for the outbreak of COVID-19 in China. Finally, the comparative analysis is designed to verify the applicability and reasonability of the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenting Xue & Zeshui Xu & Xiaomei Mi & Zhiliang Ren, 2021. "Dynamic reference point method with probabilistic linguistic information based on the regret theory for public health emergency decision-making," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 3355-3381, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:34:y:2021:i:1:p:3355-3381
    DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2021.1875254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1875254
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1875254?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:34:y:2021:i:1:p:3355-3381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rero .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.