IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/reroxx/v34y2021i1p2767-2789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic review of ordinary people, behavioural financial biases

Author

Listed:
  • J.F. Calzadilla
  • M.J. Bordonado-Bermejo
  • E. González-Rodrigo

Abstract

Behavioural Finance and Behavioural Economics are jointly fast-growing fields of research, which encompass both academicia and business. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to study the biases in decision-making by ordinary investors, also considering socio-economic variables. We do so by applying systematic review tools and meta-analysis. In this study, this analysis is conducted by using tools developed for this purpose, such as EPIReviewer. We sourced information primarily from WOS-Clarivate, and also supplement it with the Proquest database. The search provided 890 studies in total, from 2009 to 2019. After cleaning the dataset, 110 publications remained for the analysis. The output of the analysis consisted of summarised tables, frequency and cross-tabulation tables corresponding to the 17 types of biases and 15 socioeconomic variables. Inasmuch as the study was targeted to discover the type of behavioural biases and constructs that exhibit the ordinary investor‘s group, it was found that the evidence in the literature was joined with that of the institutional investors. On the other hand, the socio-economic evidence about gender, age, studies, and geography in the literature review is short, limited and partial. The results emerging from this review provide a first insight into the behavioural finance biases and socio-economic links of ordinary people based on the most recent publications. This should inform more extended studies given the importance of ordinary people as a general reference for the economy.

Suggested Citation

  • J.F. Calzadilla & M.J. Bordonado-Bermejo & E. González-Rodrigo, 2021. "A systematic review of ordinary people, behavioural financial biases," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 2767-2789, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:34:y:2021:i:1:p:2767-2789
    DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2020.1839526
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1839526
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1839526?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:34:y:2021:i:1:p:2767-2789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rero .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.