IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/reroxx/v33y2020i1p1750-1766.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The death of Political Economy: A retrospective overview of economic thought

Author

Listed:
  • Soumitra Sharma

Abstract

In following pages, the author attempts to present his thesis that the traditional social science of Political Economy is vrtually dead for long. He contends that fairly developed science had existed since 2500 BC in Mesopotamia, Egypt, China and India. The ill-fated demise of the science began in the early 17th century, and was partly accomplished in the third quarter of 19th century, that too with the rise of the Austrian School, when Carl Menger and his followers, launched their attack (against their predecessors – the Classists, Marx and the Socialists) by introducing the utility theory and the concept of marginalism, thereby developing an alternative school of economic thought. Nevertheless, the final blow was struck by Alfred Marshall, who by completely ignoring the contents of the old science, invented an entirely new conceptual web of microeconomics that made the science an ultimate victim. Tutored under Marshall, J. M. Keynes, by launching his theory of employment, interest and money, also took part in the episode. The science of political economy was dead by the end of the 1930s.

Suggested Citation

  • Soumitra Sharma, 2020. "The death of Political Economy: A retrospective overview of economic thought," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 1750-1766, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:33:y:2020:i:1:p:1750-1766
    DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2020.1761854
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1761854
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1761854?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:33:y:2020:i:1:p:1750-1766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rero .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.