IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/reroxx/v30y2017i1p858-872.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are business forecasts of the construction sector rational? Survey-based evidence from Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Chin-Hong Puah
  • Shirly Siew-Ling Wong
  • Muzafar Shah Habibullah

Abstract

This paper extends the direct measure to business expectations in assessing the doctrine of forecast rationality in the contemporary environment of Malaysia’s construction sector. The survey’s expectational series on business operational forecasts across the period 1990 to 2010 is inconsistent with Muth’s concept of rational expectations. Although strict rationality failed to be evidenced, weakly rational conduct can be observed in capital expenditure forecasts. Nevertheless, both operational variables in question are optimistically biased upward and neither of them can accurately reflect the true market perception. This evidence casts doubt on the usefulness of the investigated survey series in providing a realistic panorama of the construction sector in the near future. Notwithstanding, the irrational upshot may drop a hint to the reader on the root of alarming property overhang and price hikes in construction-related markets since expectations play a foremost role in providing equilibrium in the supply and demand in this growth-initiating market.

Suggested Citation

  • Chin-Hong Puah & Shirly Siew-Ling Wong & Muzafar Shah Habibullah, 2017. "Are business forecasts of the construction sector rational? Survey-based evidence from Malaysia," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 858-872, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:30:y:2017:i:1:p:858-872
    DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2017.1305794
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1305794
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1305794?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:30:y:2017:i:1:p:858-872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rero .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.