IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/repsxx/v9y2021i4p447-460.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China’s soft power and US public opinion

Author

Listed:
  • Yao-Yuan Yeh
  • Charles K. S. Wu
  • Wei-hao Huang

Abstract

In recent years, China has been using its soft power (most notably, the establishment of Confucius Institutes) to influence public opinion in foreign countries. However, the literature on soft power has yet to provide a definitive answer about whether that has led to a positive image of China in the foreign audience. Additionally, it is not clear if a positive image would influence public attitudes concerning foreign policies in those countries, such as policies related to trade and military conflicts. Based on an online survey experiment in June 2018, this research shows that soft power information (about positive contributions of Confucius Institutes to the American society) does make the US public feel warmer towards China and become more willing to support trade negotiations. However, the warm feeling does not alter public attitudes towards a potential military conflict with China over disputed islands in the South China Sea. Our study provides both empirical support and advice to policymakers interested in the influence of China’s soft power on US public opinion.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao-Yuan Yeh & Charles K. S. Wu & Wei-hao Huang, 2021. "China’s soft power and US public opinion," Economic and Political Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 447-460, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:repsxx:v:9:y:2021:i:4:p:447-460
    DOI: 10.1080/20954816.2021.1933766
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20954816.2021.1933766
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20954816.2021.1933766?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:repsxx:v:9:y:2021:i:4:p:447-460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/reps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.