Author
Abstract
In European politics, the issue of neo-liberalism is both dominant and contested. This political position has a foundation in an influential economic theory. This economic variant of a universal theory of human behaviour is known as ‘economic imperialism’. It is very influential in the other social sciences as well. The ‘rational-choice-model’ (RCM) is frequently employed to explain social phenomena. The RCM, formally speaking, is the approach of neo-classical economic theory. By scrutinising some presuppositions of economic imperialism, it becomes clear, however, that this approach cannot offer a universal theory of human behaviour. These considerations are not a criticism of economic rationality as such but of a specific interpretation of this rationality, namely that of economic imperialism. Although basic ideas of the RCM are criticised within the discourse of economics itself, such criticism has a primarily empirical nature. By contrast, this article develops a reflexive argument that concerns the framework of the RCM itself. RCM starts from assumptions that it does not justify, or is even unable to justify. Two of these assumptions are discussed in-depth: the givenness of preferences and the quantifiability of utility. It turns out that preferences of rational beings are not merely given but continuously evaluated. Moreover, preferences qua goals of action have a non-quantitative character: they are constituted by values. Values make up the foundation of (quantifiable) goods or preferences in the economic sense.
Suggested Citation
Christian Krijnen, 2016.
"Values – limits of economic rationality and imperialism of culture,"
Economic and Political Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 101-121, April.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:repsxx:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:101-121
DOI: 10.1080/20954816.2016.1180764
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:repsxx:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:101-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/reps .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.