IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v50y2016i5p790-804.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reform of the Barnett Formula with Needs Assessment: Can the Challenges be Overcome?

Author

Listed:
  • David King
  • David Eiser

Abstract

K ing D. and E iser D. Reform of the Barnett Formula with needs assessment: can the challenges be overcome?, Regional Studies . Block grants to the UK's devolved administrations are allocated using the Barnett Formula. There have been calls to replace this formula with one based on spending needs assessment, but two obstacles to doing so have been raised. First, that the devolved administrations would be unable to agree on how needs should be assessed; and second, it is unclear how needs assessment might work for devolved governments that can pursue different spending policies. This paper investigates the first issue by analysing whether the Scottish and English formulae for allocating health and education funding within each country are statistically similar; and the second issue through a hypothetical policy simulation analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • David King & David Eiser, 2016. "Reform of the Barnett Formula with Needs Assessment: Can the Challenges be Overcome?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(5), pages 790-804, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:50:y:2016:i:5:p:790-804
    DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2014.933799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00343404.2014.933799
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343404.2014.933799?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:50:y:2016:i:5:p:790-804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.