IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v31y1997i5p521-531.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Housing, Labour Markets and Household Structure: Questioning the Role of Secondary Data Analysis in Sustaining the Polarization

Author

Listed:
  • Helen Jarvis

Abstract

JARVIS H. (1997) Housing, labour markets and household structure: questioning the role of secondary data analysis in sustaining the polarization debate, Reg. Studies 31, 521-531. This paper presents a critique of the polarization thesis as it is popularly conceived in Britain. The apparent phenomenon of an increasing divergence of the population into extremes of multi-earner and no-earner households is typically demonstrated using secondary data sources. Consequently, polarization is explained in terms of household employment with regard to earners in a way which overlooks sources of division which emanate from within a variety of household structures. It is posited that the appearance of a polarization of household prospects is manifested, at least in part, by the conflation of social and demographic regional profiles, which combines the observation of two discrete causal mechanisms into one. To illustrate this point, data is presented from the 1991 Census of Population Sample of Anonymized Records (SARs) which identifies a pattern of disaggregated household employment compositions (by gender and hours worked) for a specific population of 'nuclear family' households. It is suggested that once the regional effects of flexible employment practices and sectoral restructuring are viewed through the lens of detailed household gender divisions of labour, beyond a one-earner versus multi-earner division, to focus on who is earning, how securely and with what effect on household practices, then questions can be asked about the social implications of global economic restructuring. JARVIS H. (1997) Le logement, les marches du travail et la structure des menages: la mise en question du role de l'analyse par donnees secondaires pour soutenir le debat sur la polarisation, Reg. Studies 31, 521-531. Cet article cherche a faire la critique de la these sur la notion de polarisation suivant les idees recues en Grande-Bretagne. Le phenomene d'un ecart qui se creuse laissant voir dans la population les deux extremes, a savoir des menages a plusieurs salaries et des menages sans salaries, est bien demontre a partir des sources de donnees secondaires. Par consequent, la polarisation s'explique en termes de l'emploi menager des salaries d'une facon qui neglige les origines d'une division qui viennent d'un eventail de structures menageres. On affirme que l'apparition d'une polarisation des perspectives d'avenir menageres se manifeste en partie par le regroupement des profils regionaux a la fois sociaux et demographiques, et qui combine l'observation de deux mecanismes causaux. On met ce point en lumiere a partir des donnees d'un echantillon de documents qui gardent l'anonymat et qui proviennent du recensement de la population 1991. Elles identifient une distribution de la composition de l'emploi menager desagregee (par sexe et en fonction des heures travaillees) relative a un nombre bien defini de menages de 'familles nucleaires'. On laisse supposer que si l'on considere les effets regionaux de l'emploi souple et de la restructuration sectorielle dans l'optique des divisions du travail detaillees et par sexe, audela d'une division qui contraste un seul salarie par rapport a plusieurs salaries, afin de porter sur qui gagne, la precarite du travail et l'impact sur le comportement du menage, on pourrait alors poser des questions au sujet des retombees sociales de la restructuration economique mondiale. JARVIS H. (1997) Wohnungen, Arbeitsmarkte und Haushaltsstruktur: Zweifel an der Rolle der Sekundardatenanalyse bei der weiteren Debatte der Polarisation, Reg. Studies 31, 521-531. Der vorliegende Aufsatz stellt eine kritische Untersuchung der in Grossbritannien ublichen Auffassung der Polarisationsthese dar. Das offensichtliche Phanomen einer zunehmenden Kluft in der Bevolkerung zwischen Mehrfachverdiener- und Nichtverdienerhaushaltstypen wird mit Hilfe von Sekundardatenquellen dargestellt. Infolgedessen wird Polarisation als Begriff der Haushaltererwerbstatigkeit erklart, die sich auf Erwerb in einer Art und Weise bezieht, die die Ursachen der von verschiedenartigen Haushaltsstrukturen ausgehenden Kluft ubersieht. Es wird postuliert, dass das Auftreten einer Polarisation der Zukunftsaussichten der Haushalte sich wenigstens teilweise in der Verschmelzung von gesellschaftlichen und demographischen Regionalprofilen manifestiert, welche die Beobachtung zweier getrennter ursachlicher Mechanismen in einen zusammenfasst. Zur Illustration dieses Punktes werden Bevolkerungsstichproben anonymisierter Untersuchungen (SARS) der Volkszahlung des Jahres 1991 angefuhrt, die ein Muster disaggregierter Erwerbstatigkeitszusammenstellungen nach Haushalten (nach Geschlecht und Arbeitsstunden ) fur eine spezifische Bevolkerung von 'Kernfamilienhaushalten' identifiziert. Es wird nahegelegt, dass die Frage nach den gesellschaftlichen Implikationen globaler wirtschaftlicher Umstrukturierung erst dann gestellt werden kann, wenn man u¨ber eine blosse Unterscheidung zwischen Allein- und Mehrfachverdienerhaushalten hinausgeht. Stattdessen mu¨ssen die regionalen Auswirkungen flexibler Bescha¨ftigungspraxis und sektoraler Umstrukturierung unter Beru¨cksichtigung detailierter geschlechtsspezfischer Arbeitsteilungen im Haushalt betrachtet werden, um herauszufinden wer verdient, wie gesichert dieses Einkommen ist und wie sich das auf den Haushalt auswirtkt.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen Jarvis, 1997. "Housing, Labour Markets and Household Structure: Questioning the Role of Secondary Data Analysis in Sustaining the Polarization," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 521-531.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:31:y:1997:i:5:p:521-531
    DOI: 10.1080/00343409750132306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343409750132306
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343409750132306?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. H Jarvis, 1999. "Identifying the Relative Mobility Prospects of a Variety of Household Employment Structures, 1981–1991," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 31(6), pages 1031-1046, June.
    2. Paul Boyle & Thomas Cooke & Keith Halfacree & Darren Smith, 2001. "A cross-national comparison of the impact of family migration on women’s employment status," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 38(2), pages 201-213, May.
    3. Russell, Helen & Layte, Richard & Maitre, Bertrand & O'Connell, Philip J. & Whelan, Christopher T., 2004. "Work-Poor Households: The Welfare Implications of Changing Household Employment Patterns," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number PRS52, June.
    4. Adrian Smith, 2000. "Employment Restructuring and Household Survival in ‘Postcommunist Transition’: Rethinking Economic Practices in Eastern Europe," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(10), pages 1759-1780, October.
    5. Steven High & Lysiane Gervais Goulet & Michelle Duchesneau & Dany Guay‐Bélanger, 2020. "Interlocking Lives: Employment Mobility and Family Fixity in Three Gentrifying Neighbourhoods of Montreal," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 505-520, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:31:y:1997:i:5:p:521-531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.