IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/recjxx/v18y2022i2p356-405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strengthening effective antitrust enforcement in digital platform markets

Author

Listed:
  • Damien Geradin
  • Dimitrios Katsifis

Abstract

While the initiatives in various jurisdictions to impose ex ante regulation on “digital gatekeepers” – large online platforms that are necessary intermediaries between business users and their customers – have attracted considerable attention, the purpose of this paper is to contribute to the debate on the equally important need to strengthen effective antitrust enforcement in digital markets. The focus is on possible adjustments to the current competition law framework on unilateral conduct. The paper examines four proposals. First, it argues in favour of revisiting the error-cost framework and considering the introduction of presumptions of anticompetitiveness in limited circumstances. Second, it makes the case that competition authorities should make greater use of restorative remedies to reinject lost competition in the market. Third, it discusses the need for greater focus on harms to quality and innovation. Fourth, it argues that when competition has been irreparably harmed, EU competition authorities should consider exploitative cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Damien Geradin & Dimitrios Katsifis, 2022. "Strengthening effective antitrust enforcement in digital platform markets," European Competition Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 356-405, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:recjxx:v:18:y:2022:i:2:p:356-405
    DOI: 10.1080/17441056.2021.2002589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17441056.2021.2002589
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17441056.2021.2002589?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:recjxx:v:18:y:2022:i:2:p:356-405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/recj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.