IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcojxx/v35y2023i1p35-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Online political communication about the Tokyo Olympics

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Lewis

Abstract

This article investigates how Japanese politicians and their followers tweeted about the Tokyo Olympics between 1 January 2020 and 24 September 2021. Using a comprehensive dataset of Japanese politicians’ tweets and followers, plus text (sentiment) and network analysis, it finds that politicians from the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) stayed relatively quiet about the Games but did tweet positively about the Games after they started. In contrast, the Japanese Communist Party (JCP) politicians tweeted energetically in their attempt to have the Games cancelled. Politicians from other parties were more muted, in line with the levels of interest expressed by their followers. Followers of Kōmeitō politicians, junior coalition partners of the LDP, tweeted much less about the Games than users following LDP politicians. These findings were repeated when politically interested users were grouped into clusters of mutual followers. Overall, this suggests that the Olympics were a polarizing issue in Japan, with users following opposition figures strongly opposed to the Games while those following the largest governing party were more supportive.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Lewis, 2023. "Online political communication about the Tokyo Olympics," Contemporary Japan, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 35-54, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcojxx:v:35:y:2023:i:1:p:35-54
    DOI: 10.1080/18692729.2023.2171845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/18692729.2023.2171845
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/18692729.2023.2171845?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcojxx:v:35:y:2023:i:1:p:35-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcoj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.