IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcojxx/v32y2020i1p43-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The “improvement of funeral ceremonies” movement and the creation of “modern” Japanese subjects in Taiwan during Japanese rule

Author

Listed:
  • Chizuru Tainaka

Abstract

This paper is a historical inquiry into the movement for the “improvement of funeral ceremonies” in Taiwan under Japanese Rule as it unfolded from the 1930s. The traditional funerary culture of Taiwan has been researched and analyzed thoroughly by cultural anthropologists, but there were only few insights into how the political and colonial configuration of society changed and in turn influenced the contents of funeral ceremonies and the attitudes of those involved in them. In later colonial Taiwan, where the majority of the Taiwanese population was comprised of Han Chinese who shared cultural ties and values with China, a “modernization” (= Japanization) of funeral ceremonies was achieved by the ruling Japanese authorities according to their own values. In order to prove this in detail and to understand the entire process, it is necessary to look at this topic also from an historian’s standpoint. In this paper, various source material from colonial Taiwan is used to identify and inspect the movement for the “improvement of funeral ceremonies”, see what it aimed at and how new practices were realized. Also, changes in the tendency of cremation rates and the use of public graveyards are scrutinized. Finally, this paper analyzes the conflicts and discontinuities caused in Taiwanese mentality by the denial of the traditional funeral rituals by Japanese authorities, and considers how such changes were perceived in literary works of Taiwanese who published in the Japanese language at that time.

Suggested Citation

  • Chizuru Tainaka, 2020. "The “improvement of funeral ceremonies” movement and the creation of “modern” Japanese subjects in Taiwan during Japanese rule," Contemporary Japan, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 43-62, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcojxx:v:32:y:2020:i:1:p:43-62
    DOI: 10.1080/18692729.2019.1709137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/18692729.2019.1709137
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/18692729.2019.1709137?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcojxx:v:32:y:2020:i:1:p:43-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcoj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.