IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcojxx/v31y2019i2p215-233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An investigation into the roles of the Katakana syllabary in Japanese discourse: From the perspective of discourse producers’ motivation

Author

Listed:
  • Yumiko Cochrane

Abstract

This article investigates the role(s) of the katakana syllabary in Japanese discourse, with a focus on the discourse producer’s underlying motivation for using katakana for native Japanese terms and how it influences word perception. Specifically, this study analyses 1) a corpus of texts to identify patterns in use and 2) a survey of professional writers (e.g., journalists, column writers) to triangulate results obtained from text analysis. Results show that the katakana syllabary is used to indicate the word in question is somehow ‘different’ from the norm, making a visual and mental distinction in the commonly shared word or concept. While each writer’s motivations may widely vary, the findings of this study suggest that in any written discourse, katakana may be employed to conceptualise a dichotomous view in otherwise common concepts. This also suggests that over time the original role of the katakana syllabary has been extended to becoming the linguistic choice of convenience, with roles ranging from filling lexical gaps to creating meaning gaps in Japanese native words.

Suggested Citation

  • Yumiko Cochrane, 2019. "An investigation into the roles of the Katakana syllabary in Japanese discourse: From the perspective of discourse producers’ motivation," Contemporary Japan, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 215-233, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcojxx:v:31:y:2019:i:2:p:215-233
    DOI: 10.1080/18692729.2019.1603822
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/18692729.2019.1603822
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/18692729.2019.1603822?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcojxx:v:31:y:2019:i:2:p:215-233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcoj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.