IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcojxx/v30y2018i2p204-226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regulating risks in healthcare in Japan: Between new politics and the tradition of liberal practice in medicine

Author

Listed:
  • Naonori Kodate

Abstract

Liberal practice in the medical professions has long been the tradition and de-facto position of the Japanese government. However, accountability and transparency in healthcare governance have recently drawn scrutiny, primarily due to several adverse events in hospitals. While New Public Management and risk-based approaches have not penetrated the design of regulatory management and compliance strategies, there has been increased institutional capacity and a search for a new mechanism of regulating risks in healthcare. This paper attempts to identify the directions of policy developments in Japan. It questions whether the conventional model of professional self-regulation in medicine is eroding, as in many English-speaking countries. The article demonstrates that while we may identify some common trends such as greater transparency and the creation of arm’s length bodies, policy decisions prove deeply embedded in governance arrangements, and professional self-regulation in healthcare remains resilient, particularly in Japan.

Suggested Citation

  • Naonori Kodate, 2018. "Regulating risks in healthcare in Japan: Between new politics and the tradition of liberal practice in medicine," Contemporary Japan, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 204-226, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcojxx:v:30:y:2018:i:2:p:204-226
    DOI: 10.1080/18692729.2018.1501794
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/18692729.2018.1501794
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/18692729.2018.1501794?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcojxx:v:30:y:2018:i:2:p:204-226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcoj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.