IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcojxx/v28y2016i2p209-228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reforming Japanese-style management: destabilizing hegemony through discourse intervention

Author

Listed:
  • David Rear

Abstract

This paper examines the attempts of Japanese business groups to destabilize the discursive hegemony of Japanese-style management and replace it with a new neoliberal order advantageous to management interests. Japanese-style management (Nihon-teki keiei) can be seen as a key element of Japanese social identity, which interpellates both workers and management into performing particular institutional practices. Altering these practices requires not only deregulatory reforms to the labor market but also a powerful discursive intervention to undermine and replace sedimented positions. Through an analysis of public policy documents, this paper shows how Japanese business groups have been carrying out such an intervention through the articulation of two keywords – “diversity” (tayōsei) and “independent-style employee” (jiritsu-gata jinzai) – which are used ambiguously to structure a controversial deregulatory agenda into existing discourses of globalization, creativity and social values.

Suggested Citation

  • David Rear, 2016. "Reforming Japanese-style management: destabilizing hegemony through discourse intervention," Contemporary Japan, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 209-228, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcojxx:v:28:y:2016:i:2:p:209-228
    DOI: 10.1515/cj-2016-0011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1515/cj-2016-0011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/cj-2016-0011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcojxx:v:28:y:2016:i:2:p:209-228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcoj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.